Category Archives: FP6500 recent

Argosy FP6902 Module 1 Assignment 2 Principles of Investigative Psychology recent

Argosy FP6902 Module 1 Assignment 2 Principles of Investigative Psychology recent

Check this A+ tutorial guideline at

http://www.uopassignments.com/fp6902-argosy/fp6902-module-1-assignment-2-principles-of-investigative-psychology-recent

 

For more classes visit

http://www.uopassignments.com

FP6902 Module 1 Assignment 2 Principles of Investigative Psychology recent

 

Argosy FP6500 Module 5 Assignment 2 LASA Therapeutic and Forensic Roles recent

Argosy FP6500 Module 5 Assignment 2 LASA Therapeutic and Forensic Roles recent

 

Check this A+ tutorial guideline at

http://www.uopassignments.com/fp6500-argosy/fp6500-module-5-assignment-2-lasa-therapeutic-and-forensic-roles-recent

 

For more classes visit

http://www.uopassignments.com

For many years, the ethical dilemma of playing both a therapeutic role and a forensic role has been debated in the literature. Some authorities argue that there is always a conflict of interest in such dual relationships, while other authorities argue that the two roles can be reconciled and impartiality can be maintained. Using the Argosy University online library resources and the Internet, locate at least ten articles that discuss the therapeutic role and the forensic role and take a stance on this particular debate. Make sure that your collection of articles is balanced with regard to the roles and the viewpoints.

Tasks:

Utilize the ethical decision-making process you learned about in M1 Assignment 3 to create a 7- to 8-page argumentative paper supporting your stand. In other words, in a reasoned fashion, develop an argument for whether the two roles—therapeutic and forensic—can ethically coincide.

The course paper is essentially an argumentative essay. Refer to the following for guidelines on writing argumentative essays:

Writing Argumentative Essays Tutorial: Contents
Types of Papers: Argument/Argumentative
Ensure that you follow the following instructions:

Using multiple sources, defend your thesis on how and why therapeutic and forensic roles can or cannot be reconciled.

Ensure that you argue for a particular side of the issue (not arguing both sides) and that your argument is well-supported by scholarly literature, professional ethical guidelines, and the law.
Include solid reasoning and a compelling thesis.

Remember, a strong argument always supports its ideas and proves the other side wrong. Make sure to both support your views with credible arguments and sources and to also refute the other side.
Use proper grammar and spelling. Additionally, the paper should be written and formatted in APA style.

 

Argosy FP6500 Module 5 Assignment 1 Addressing Ethical Dilemmas recent

Argosy FP6500 Module 5 Assignment 1 Addressing Ethical Dilemmas recent

Check this A+ tutorial guideline at

http://www.uopassignments.com/fp6500-argosy/fp6500-module-5-assignment-1-addressing-ethical-dilemmas-recent

 

For more classes visit

http://www.uopassignments.com

FP6500 Module 5 Assignment 1 Addressing Ethical Dilemmas recent

 

Argosy FP6500 Module 4 Assignment 2 Critical Evaluation of Court Case Commonwealth of Virginia v Allen recent

Argosy FP6500 Module 4 Assignment 2 Critical Evaluation of Court Case Commonwealth of Virginia v Allen recent

Check this A+ tutorial guideline at

http://www.uopassignments.com/fp6500-argosy/fp6500-module-4-assignment-2-critical-evaluation-of-court-case-commonwealth-of-virginia-v-allen-recent

 

For more classes visit

http://www.uopassignments.com

 

It is important to understand the impact an expert testimony may have in the ultimate decision made by a court. In addition, it is helpful for practitioners of forensic psychology to be able to read and understand legal cases.

Tasks:

Click here to review the case Commonwealth of Virginia v. Allen (2005).

The case describes an appellate legal opinion or court decision involving expert witness testimony. When a case is appealed, it goes to an appellate or to a higher court. The appellate court then reviews the findings of the lower court, which in this case was the trial court. The appellate court offered the following two opinions:

The first opinion (Commonwealth of Virginia v. Allen, 2005, pp. 1–24) is the majority opinion and is the one that counts.
The second opinion (Commonwealth of Virginia v. Allen, 2005, pp. 24–31) is an opinion filed by a minority of judges who concurred (agreed) in part and dissented (disagreed) in part with the majority of the judges who ruled.

After reading the appellate legal opinion, write a 2- to 3-page paper addressing the following:

Discuss whether either of the expert witnesses in this case acted unethically. Support your opinion with the relevant APA or specialty ethical guidelines.

Indicate whether you agree with the majority decision or the minority concurring or dissenting opinion. Explain why.
The paper should be in APA style.

Reference:

Commonwealth of Virginia v. Allen, 609 S.E.2d 4 (Va. 2005).

 

Argosy FP6500 Module 4 Assignment 1 Attorney Tactics recent

Argosy FP6500 Module 4 Assignment 1 Attorney Tactics recent

 

 

Check this A+ tutorial guideline at

http://www.uopassignments.com/fp6500-argosy/fp6500-module-4-assignment-1-attorney-tactics-recent

 

For more classes visit

http://www.uopassignments.com

FP6500 Module 4 Assignment 1 Attorney Tactics recent

 

Argosy FP6500 Module 3 Assignment 2 Case Analysis Ethical and Professional Conflicts in Correctional Psychology recent

Argosy FP6500 Module 3 Assignment 2 Case Analysis Ethical and Professional Conflicts in Correctional Psychology recent

 

 

Check this A+ tutorial guideline at

http://www.uopassignments.com/fp6500-argosy/fp6500-module-3-assignment-2-case-analysis-ethical-and-professional-conflicts-in-correctional-psychology-recent

 

For more classes visit

http://www.uopassignments.com

 

In this assignment, you will discuss the issues pertaining to informed consent in conducting evaluations and apply ethical decision making to a scenario in which there is a professional ethical conflict.

Tasks:

Review vignette 3 from the following article:

Ethical and Professional Conflicts in Correctional Psychology
After you have read the vignette, answer the following questions in a 2- to 3-page paper:

Should the evaluation, which is requested by the warden, be completed? Why or why not?

Would your answer change if the psychologist were not a member of APA? Why or why not?

Support your answers with appropriate references in APA style.
Submission Details:

Save your paper as M3_A2_Lastname_Firstname.doc. By Module 3, Day 7, post it to the M3 Assignment 2 RA Dropbox.

 

Argosy FP6500 Module 3 Assignment 1 Limits to Confidentiality recent

Argosy FP6500 Module 3 Assignment 1 Limits to Confidentiality recent

 

 

Check this A+ tutorial guideline at

http://www.uopassignments.com/fp6500-argosy/fp6500-module-3-assignment-1-limits-to-confidentiality-recent

 

For more classes visit

http://www.uopassignments.com

FP6500 Module 3 Assignment 1 Limits to Confidentiality recent

 

Argosy FP6500 Module 2 Assignment 2 Case Analysis recent

Argosy FP6500 Module 2 Assignment 2 Case Analysis recent

 

 

Check this A+ tutorial guideline at

http://www.uopassignments.com/fp6500-argosy/fp6500-module-2-assignment-2-case-analysis-recent

 

For more classes visit

http://www.uopassignments.com

 

You have a friend who is a mental health practitioner. He or she was invited to attend the bar mitzvah of a thirteen-year-old child he or she is treating. After considering the offer, he or she decides to go but has asked for your advice.

Tasks:

In a 2- to 3-page paper and using appropriate ethical guidelines, answer the following questions:

What would you recommend and why?
Would your recommendations differ if the therapy had concluded?

Would your recommendations differ depending on the type of mental health professional involved? If yes, in what way? If no, why not?

Support your recommended actions with appropriate professional ethical guidelines and laws of your region. Additionally, cite all supporting ideas. Finally, your submission should be written and formatted in current APA style.

 

Argosy FP6500 Module 2 Assignment 1 Adversarial Legal System recent

Argosy FP6500 Module 2 Assignment 1 Adversarial Legal System recent

 

Check this A+ tutorial guideline at

http://www.uopassignments.com/fp6500-argosy/fp6500-module-2-assignment-1-adversarial-legal-system-recent

 

For more classes visit

http://www.uopassignments.com

FP6500 Module 2 Assignment 1 Adversarial Legal System recent

 

Argosy FP6500 Module 1 Assignment 3 Eight Steps in Ethical Decision Making recent

Argosy FP6500 Module 1 Assignment 3 Eight Steps in Ethical Decision Making recent

 

Check this A+ tutorial guideline at

http://www.uopassignments.com/fp6500-argosy/fp6500-module-1-assignment-3-eight-steps-in-ethical-decision-making-recent

 

For more classes visit

http://www.uopassignments.com

FP6500 Module 1 Assignment 3 Eight Steps in Ethical Decision Making recent