Category Archives: SOC 331 (ASH)

SOC 331 Week 5 Quiz

To Buy This material Click below link

http://www.uopassignments.com/soc-331-ash/soc-331-week-5-quiz

Question :

According to the FBI, hate crimes in the U.S. in 2010 based on a bias against race were committed largely against which of the following?

Student Answer:

Blacks

Whites

Hispanics

Asians

 

Question :

Which of the following is NOT true of solitary confinement in U. S. prisons?

Student Answer:

It is fifty percent less costly than non-solitary confinement.

There are fewer than 200,000 prisoners in solitary confinement in the U.S.

The United States has more prisoners in solitary confinement than does any other democratic nation.

Some people believe it may rehabilitate bad behavior.

 

Question : What prompted the North Carolina’s Racial Justice Act of 2005?

Student Answer:

White criminals seeking presidential pardons were four times as likely as minorities to receive such pardons.

Prosecutors eliminated prospective Black jurors from juries at more than twice the rate of White jurors in death penalty cases.

Judges had to change a penalty of death to life without parole if race played a key role in the death sentence.

There were pronounced racial disparities in hate crimes in which Whites were less apt to be victims than members of other races.

 

Question : Which of the following most closely corresponds to the type of justice that South Africa’s Truth and Reconciliation Commission seeks?

Student Answer:

Reformative

Retributive

Corrective

Restorative

 

Question : What is one purpose for which the International Criminal Court’s Trust Fund for Victims exists?

Student Answer:

To fine nations that violate international law.

To take cases of alleged abuse of human rights.

To ensure payment of court-ordered reparations.

To provide rehabilitation to perpetrators of crimes within the jurisdiction of the ICC.

 

Question : What is Bulubulu?

Student Answer:

A South African principle that promotes corrective justice through apology and recompense or reconciliation.

A Fijian principle that allows an alleged rapist to avoid retributive justice through apology and recompense or reconciliation.

A Fijian principle that requires corporal punishment as a means of apology and recompense or reconciliation.

A South African principle that allows political leaders to avoid conviction for genocide through apology and recompense or reconciliation.

 

Question : Approximately what percentage of homicide victims in the United States are 65 years old or older?

Student Answer:

5

10

20

40

 

Question : A bond that is put up by a third party to guarantee a bail amount in return for fee is called a __________

Student Answer:

Surety bond.

Municipal bind.

Punitive bind.

Requisite bond.

 

Question : What was the U. S. Supreme Court’s decision in Morse v. Frederick?

Student Answer:

Frederick had the right to express the sentiment “Bong hits 4 Jesus” on a banner.

The school district was to pay Frederick $45,000 for violating his right to free speech.

The school had the right to regulate speech promoting drug use.

The Constitution of Alaska protected Frederick’s right to free speech.

 

Question : Which of the following would NOT make corrective justice easy to implement?

Student Answer:

Knowing who did the damage that requires correction.

Knowing what it would take to restore to the perpetrator what he lost.

Knowing who suffered the damage that requires correction.

Knowing what it take to restore to the victim what he lost.

For more Assignments visit

http://www.uopassignments.com

SOC 331 Week 5 DQ 2 Alternative to Retributive Justice

To Buy This material Click below link

http://www.uopassignments.com/soc-331-ash/soc-331-week-5-dq-2-alternative-to-retributive-justice

In Chapter 5 of the text, the author discusses four alternatives to retributive justice: corrective justice, reformative justice, restorative justice, and transformative justice (see Section 5.3).

In “Case Study 5.5 – Dead Woman Walking,” the text describes the circumstances that led to the 1998 execution in Texas of Karla Faye Tucker. Before she was executed she requested, but was denied, clemency. Her cause was supported by many political, correctional, and moral leaders.

Would the application of any of the four alternatives to retribution have produced a more just outcome? Your initial post must explain and apply each of the four alternative theories of justice to Karla Faye Tucker’s case. Also, critically evaluate each of the alternatives in the circumstances of her case. Why does each theory produce a more or less just outcome than the approach actually followed by the State of Texas? Finally, is the utility of each alternative limited to the unusual circumstances of Karla’s case or do they have value more generally to merit consideration as a more just approach than retributive justice?

For more Assignments visit

http://www.uopassignments.com

SOC 331 Week 5 DQ 1 Retributive Justice and Mandatory Life Imprisonment for Juvenile Offenders

To Buy This material Click below link

http://www.uopassignments.com/soc-331-ash/soc-331-week-5-dq-1-retributive-justice-and-mandatory-life-imprisonment-for-juvenile-offenders

In Chapter 5 of the textbook, the author examines retributive justice from the standpoint of the means of punishment (Section 5.2). He calls attention to the length of prison sentences and, in particular, the issue of mandatory life sentences for juvenile offenders.

In 2012, the U.S. Supreme Court declared laws that require judges to impose life-without-parole sentences for juveniles to be in violation of the Eighth Amendment’s prohibition of “cruel and unusual punishments.” The decision (Miller v. Alabama) was a 5-4 split in the Court – which is typical of many such decisions that apply the cruel and unusual punishment provision.

Your initial post must analyze the retributive justice issues of mandatory, life-without-parole sentences. Consider the facts of Miller v. Alabama: Defendant Miller, a 14-year old boy, with an accomplice beat the victim with a baseball bat and set his trailer on fire with the victim inside. Defendant Miller was tried as an adult for capital murder while committing arson.

Is a mandatory, life-without-parole sentence just in such circumstances? Remember that “just” may or may not be the same as “constitutional.” Summarize both the pros and the cons of your answer to this question, and critically evaluate these pros and cons, applying principles of retributive justice discussed in the text. Your evaluation must respond to the pros and cons, giving persuasive reasons why you agree with some and disagree with some.​

 

For more Assignments visit

http://www.uopassignments.com

SOC 331 Week 4 Quiz

To Buy This material Click below link

http://www.uopassignments.com/soc-331-ash/SOC-331-Week-4-Quiz

Question : With which of the following is commutative justice NOT concerned?

Student Answer:

Is the contract a legal document?

Is the contract moral?

Have all parties fulfilled their part of the contract?

Does the contract require distributing goods and services equally?

                                  

Question : Which of the following was NOT a reason given by Torry-Ann Hansen for returning her adopted son, Artem, to Russia?

Student Answer:

The Russian orphanage lied to her.

She had a mental illness.

The safety of her friends and family.

Artem’s citizenship

 

Question : Which of the following is NOT one of the possible criteria for a valid contract?

Student Answer:

Promise

Compromise

Consideration

Consent

 

Question : Which of the following is NOT true of the Ancient Roman Republic

Student Answer:

It had a constitution

It allowed all citizens to participate directly in public policy making

It had branches of government similar to the United States

It lasted longer than the Ancient Athenian democracy

Question : How did the World Association for Children and Parents respond to Torry-Ann Hansen when she returned her adopted son, Artem, to Russia?

Student Answer:

It suspended all adoptions.

It sued Torry-Ann for breach of contract.

It sued Torry-Ann for child support.

It suspended Russian adoptions.

 

Question : Which of the following is an argument against the possibility of intergenerational contracts?

Student Answer:

The modern welfare state.

The older party is not expected to give something back to the younger party.

The younger party is expected to work and to give something to those who came before them.

The benefits and the burdens of the contract must be reasonably foreseeable.

 

Question : Of the following, which is NOT one of the criticisms of social contract theory?

Student Answer:

It mitigates some of the problems of the state of nature.

It assumes all people are similar enough to agree on a contract.

The sovereign should be able to make the rules at will, without consulting the masses.

There is no evidence that an original social contract ever took place.

 

Question : Which of the following is NOT true concerning Pakistani Sabatina James and her experience with arranged marriages?

Student Answer:

As a resident of Pakistan, Sabatina was required to submit to the arrangement under Islamic law.

Her parents arranged her marriage despite her wishes.

She agreed to enter into the arranged marriage.

She converted to Catholicism to avoid the arrangement.

 

Question : Which of the following is an argument in defense of reparations?

Student Answer:

Direct victims are no longer alive.

There is precedent for paying reparations.

It is difficult to determine how far back to go n determining victims.

It isn’t always possible to identify descendants of direct victims.

 

Question : Which of the following is NOT a reason why Edmund Burke argued that all of society is a contract?

Student Answer:

Society is a partnership in all art.

Society’s contract is a particular in every virtue

Society’s contract is a particular in all perfection.

Society is a partnership whose ends can be obtained in many generations.

For more Assignments visit

http://www.uopassignments.com

SOC 331 Week 4 DQ 2 Commutative Justice and the National Debt

To Buy This material Click below link

http://www.uopassignments.com/soc-331-ash/soc-331-week-4-dq-2-commutative-justice-and-the-national-debt

In Chapter 4 of the text, the author examines commutative justice across the generations (see Section 4.5). This idea arises from the writings of British political thinker Edmund Burke (1790):

“Society is indeed a contract… a partnership in all art, a particular in every virtue, and in all perfection. As the ends of such a partnership cannot be obtained in many generations, it becomes a partnership not only between those who are living, but between those who are living, those who are dead, and those who are to be born…”

(Reflections on the French Revolution, para. 165)

Burke’s idea of a social contract between generations is often cited in contemporary debates about the spiraling nation debt of the United States. What do young and old citizens living today owe, as a matter of commutative justice, to generations of citizens who are not yet born? Is it just for today’s citizens to demand policies (e.g., low taxes and high levels of government service) that create huge debts for future generations to pay?

For more Assignments visit

http://www.uopassignments.com

SOC 331 Week 4 DQ 1 Commutative Justice and Embryo Adoption

To Buy This material Click below link

http://www.uopassignments.com/soc-331-ash/soc-331-week-4-dq-1-commutative-justice-and-embryo-adoption

In Chapter 4 of the textbook, the author examines commutative justice as arising from contractual relationships – a specific contract among particular parties or a broader social contract on which a community or nation is based. He also discusses how the interpretation or enforceability of a specific contract may be influenced by the principles and values that are part of the broader social contract.

At the end of 2012, more than 600,000 frozen embryos are being maintained in cryopreservation storage facilities in the United States. Some of them are the subject of agreements in which one party transfers one or more embryos to another party for implantation. Such agreements may be called “Embryo Adoption Agreements,” although there is controversy over the use of the term adoption since the legal status of an embryo is different from that of a living child. In recent years, there have been a number of legal disputes arising from these agreements. Cynthia Marietta describes one of these disputes, McLaughlin v. Lambert, in her article, Frozen embryo litigation spotlights pressing questions: What is the legal status of an embryo and can it be adopted?
First, carefully read this article. Then, in your initial post, analyze the issues of commutative justice in this case, and apply the principles discussed by both Marietta and the textbook (see Section 4.4). Be sure to consider whether values that are part of the broader social contract (e.g., the U.S. Constitution) may influence how the specific contract between the two couples in this case should be interpreted justly. Consider this case from both sides of the dispute as well as from the perspective of society’s interest in the status of frozen embryos.

For more Assignments visit

http://www.uopassignments.com

SOC 331 Week 3 Quiz

To Buy This material Click below link

http://www.uopassignments.com/soc-331-ash/soc-331-week-3-quiz

1. Question : Of the following, which is NOT an element in George McGovern’s “recent definition of ‘defense’”?

Student Answer:

The quality of our education

Military protection against terrorism

The health of our people

The strength of our transportation

 

2. Question : Of the following, which is NOT a criticism of Utilitarianism?

Student Answer:

There is the threat of the tyranny of the majority.

People should promote the greatest good for the greatest number.

John Stuart Mill, an influential proponent of utilitarianism, incorrectly assumes that “desirable” and “desired” mean the same thing.

Utilitarianism is subjective and subjectivism renders moral debate meaningless.

 

3. Question : The question about who has the right to vote is a matter of ______________ justice.

Student Answer:

Retributive

Distributive

Transformative

Corrective

 

4. Question : People are more willing to pay to watch Marcelena play tennis than to watch others play tennis. So it’s just that she receives higher pay than the others. This view is consistent with

Student Answer:

Robert Nozick’s Egalitarianism

John Stuart Mill’s Retributivism

John Stuart Mill’s Utilitarianism

Robert Nozick’s Libertarianism

 

5. Question : Why did Malcolm Birnbaum argue that the mentally ill have a constitutional right to adequate treatment?

Student Answer:

Because government has no right to commit people to mental hospitals against their will.

Because committing mentally ill people to hospitals against their will constitutes cruel and unusual punishment.

Because patients committed involuntarily who receive inadequate treatment are deprived of liberty without due process.

Because patients committed involuntarily who receive inadequate treatment are not receiving equal protection under the law.

 

6. Question : Which of the following was NOT a result of the Civil War Amendments?

Student Answer:

Women got the right to vote.

Black men received the right to vote.

Equal citizenship under the law.

Abolishment of slavery.

 

7. Question : Which of the following best describes Norman Daniels’ Prudential Lifespan Account?

Student Answer:

Goods and services should be allocated in similar amounts across a person’s lifespan.

Goods and services should be distributed equally among all people no matter what their age is.

Whatever is a just distribution at a given age should be available to everyone of that age.

Whatever is a just distribution at given age should be available to anyone of any age.

 

8. Question : Which theories of distributive justice require some allocation of resources to the needy?

Student Answer:

Utilitarianism and egalitarianism, but not libertarianism

Utilitarianism, but not egalitarianism or libertarianism

Utilitarianism and libertarianism, but not egalitarianism

Libertarianism and egalitarianism, but not utilitarianism

 

9. Question : Of the following theories of distributive justice, which could consistently support equal pay for men and women?

Student Answer:

Egalitarian and utilitarian, but not libertarian

Egalitarian, but not utilitarian or libertarian

Egalitarian and libertarian, but not utilitarian

Egalitarian, utilitarian, and libertarian

 

10. Question : Heather believes that justice demands giving every stakeholder an equal share of public goods and services. To this extent, therefore, she is

Student Answer:

A utilitarian in matters of retributive justice

An egalitarian in matters of distributive justice

An egalitarian in matters of retributive justice

A utilitarian in matters of distributive justice

For more Assignments visit

http://www.uopassignments.com

SOC 331 Week 3 DQ 2 Distributive Justice and Scarce Natural Resources

To Buy This material Click below link

http://www.uopassignments.com/soc-331-ash/soc-331-week-3-dq-2-distributive-justice-and-scarce-natural-resources

In Chapter 3 of the text, the author calls attention to how struggles for scarce natural resources will pose increasingly difficult problems of distributive justice in the future, on both the local and global levels. “Case 3.4 – Fracking Friction” (in Section 3.4) explores this issue in the context of fracking for natural gas.
Suppose that the connection between fracking and adverse health effects is as yet an unproven possibility. Do individuals’ health interests outweigh the property interests of energy companies in withholding information about fracking chemicals, which they claim are trade-secrets? Why or why not?
Your initial post must, from the perspective of distributive justice, explain your response to the above questions as they relate to Case 3.4. Consider the issue from both sides (the pros and cons). Incorporate arguments that draw upon libertarian, utilitarian, and egalitarian views of distributive justice.
To help you successfully complete this discussion, review the following required resources:

a. Fracking secrets by thousands keep U.S. clueless on wells

b. Fracking: Abundant energy, but at what cost?

c. Is fracking making people sick? [Radio broadcast]

d. Fracking our food supply 

For more Assignments visit

http://www.uopassignments.com

SOC 331 Week 3 DQ 1 Distributive Justice Across the Generations

To Buy This material Click below link

http://www.uopassignments.com/soc-331-ash/soc-331-week-3-dq-1-distributive-justice-across-the-generations

In Chapter 3 of your textbook, the author discusses how demographic differences, such as age, influence understandings of distributive justice. He also reviews how libertarian, utilitarian, and egalitarian theories of distributive justice enter into conversations across demographic divides. The soaring cost of health care, the limitations of the economy in paying for health care, and the growing proportion of the population who are over age 65, have given rise to serious discussion, at times acrimonious, about the possible need to or the justice of rationing health care to that age group. A common definition of rationing is withholding some specific medical treatments for reasons other than a patient’s desire to have the treatment (e.g., Medicare not paying for certain treatments for very elderly patients). In your discussion, you must, from the perspective of distributive justice, summarize the major arguments on both sides (the pros and cons) of the issue of whether health care should be rationed to the elderly. You must also characterize these arguments according to whether they are primarily libertarian, utilitarian, or egalitarian in nature. Finally, you will evaluate these arguments from your view of distributive justice, explaining both how your personal life experiences and your own libertarian, utilitarian, or egalitarian views influence your evaluation.
To help you successfully complete this discussion, review the following required resources:

a. Callahan, D., &Nuland, S. B. (2011, June 19). The quagmire: How American medicine is destroying itself. The New Republic, 242(8), 16-18. Retrieved from the EBSCOhost database.

b. Rationing by any other name: Reasons for resisting the push to limit medical care

c. Should we ration end-of-life care? [Radio broadcast]

d. Rationing health care at end of life: Student handout 3 

For more Assignments visit

http://www.uopassignments.com

SOC 331 Week 2 State vs Federal Marijuana Legalization

To Buy This material Click below link

http://www.uopassignments.com/soc-331-ash/soc-331-week-2-state-vs-federal-marijuana-legalization

 For this assignment, you will again follow the suggestion to “look at justice through… frameworks that permit careful analysis and evaluation of competing views” (Dreisbach, 2013, Section 2.1). Again, you will apply his framework for analyzing how the concept of justice varies when viewed from the different perspectives of family, community, state, and nation. In this assignment, you will apply this framework to analyze justice issues arising from recent successful efforts to legalize recreational marijuana use in two states and medical marijuana in several other states. Before responding, carefully read the assignment prompt below. By the end of 2012, eighteen states and the District of Columbia had legalized medical marijuana use, under various circumstances, and two states had legalized recreational marijuana use. Legalization proposals are pending in other states. At the same time, the federal government’s Controlled Substances Act (CSA) bans the possession, production, sale, or distribution of marijuana, even when such activity is technically in compliance with state law. Moreover, the Supreme Court has affirmed the constitutionality of federal enforcement of the CSA against individuals who were in possession of or were growing marijuana for medical use in compliance with California law. Analyze the retributive, commutative and distributive justice of this complex situation from each of these different perspectives:

a. A recreational pot smoker who lives in a state that recently legalized growing, possessing, selling, and distributing, through state-regulated dispensaries, limited amounts of marijuana for medical use.

b. A parent living in the same state, concerned that her 12-year-old will be exposed to recent and significant risks of addiction to pot that will be readily available in their community.

c. An HIV patient, also living in this state, whose doctor advises that smoking small amounts of marijuana will probably relieve some of his pain.

d. The Chief of Police of the city where these people live, who has urged the City Council to enact recent local zoning and other regulations that will make it virtually impossible for medical marijuana dispensaries to operate in the city.

e. The state’s recent Medical Marijuana Board, which is empowered to permit and regulate dispensaries but is without the power to withhold permits, merely because of local opposition in a particular community.

f. The President and Attorney General of the United States who are responsible for enforcing the CSA as well as upholding the nation’s obligations to implement anti-drug treaties that it has ratified.

From your analysis of these various perspectives, draw a conclusion about how to achieve the most just resolution to issues involving the availability of marijuana in American society.

For more Assignments visit

http://www.uopassignments.com